Technical annotations for photographers: the camera,
a Sony Nex-5N was adapted in a purely mechanical manner, being connected by standard photographic
M42 spacer rings plus a camera-specific M42 > Sony adapter.
For fig. 3 the light was merely passing through one of the 4x objectives, then through one of
the 16x eyepieces and from there directly on the CMOS camera chip (no additional, dedicated optics and
no camera objective needed). As we are dealing with twin pairs of objectives,
each looking slightly laterally on the object from both sides, the object plate had to
be slightly inclined towards the photographing objective, at an angle of ca. 7.5°.
As already explained previously the stereo microscope can provide a range of
16x - 64x - 160x (!) with the 16x eyepieces in place. But when looking
at the respective numerical apertures of the objectives (0.05, 0.08 und 0.1 - being
a measure for their individual resolving power) it will become clear that the resolution
step between the 4x and 10x objective cannot be very impressive. So in most
cases the photographer will be better off with the 4x/16x (64x) combination
than with the 10x/16x (160x) maximum configuration.
Resume: it comes as no surprise that the Großfeld stereo microscope
is the winner in this competition. Nevertheless we were quite impressed by the fact that
the stereo microscope is actually performing much better, even revealing
tiny flaws and scratches on the figures.
In the next issue we will demonstrate that a high grade single mag dedicated
folding magnifier can do a much better job. But still, the Octoscop
is a nice instrument with a beautiful design!
|